You are reading the recap of episode 3 of the Netflix series Chair Collaborated with writers Alison Kinney, Grace Lafry, Dan Sinikin and Rebecca Vanzo.Find our other episode recaps here.

with: Sorry, I just want to start this discussion David Duchoni, author A Criticism of Pure Reason Schizophrenia in Beckett’s Early Novels.

Rebecca: When I was in graduate school, a TV crew filmed scenes representing the fictional Ivy League school of Duke University. A colleague of mine wanted to be an extra, and I joked with him that he wanted to “pull a Duchoni”.

with: love it.

Rebecca: Obviously, one of the themes here is the possible impact of interventions by donors and trustees-which is ridiculous, but for audiences who were not familiar with this phenomenon before Nikole Hannah-Jones, it may have different impacts.

Grace: party. real.

with: The scene we are talking about-Ji-Yoon has dinner with the dean and a trustee. The trustee insists on giving Duchovny (who she met at the local farmer’s market) an annual outstanding lecture, despite the fact that Ji-Yoon has already told Yaz Provided it-like most of the show, it’s fun and frustrating. “He is the kind of person who can revive literary studies,” the excited trustee declared. Later, the dean tried to persuade Ji-Yoon. He pointed out that Duchovny was a writer who would inspire students, and he emphasized that he “want to produce content”. This is a devastating route. Although all its intellectuals went bankrupt, it illuminates a fault line in the show (and in real life): technology, social media, the Internet.In the latest issue of the journal PMLA, Alcy Ward Call on us to change the subject Make it suitable for the Internet. Whether this is a good idea — I think it is — is part of the intergenerational tensions of the show, as reflected in the teaching differences between Elliott and Yaz.

The town hall at the end of the episode confirms my biggest worry about how the show imagines students: in a world where bad reading is the worst crime, they are bad readers. As Grace wrote, they embodied the paranoid fantasies of the Fox News host, crucifying an unworthy white man. At the same time, colleges are flooded with whites who actually behave badly, and they have never been held accountable.

We called four scholars to talk about the drama’s depiction of the academic world, and they did not flinch. Read the summary:

Grace: Yes. On the one hand, why is there a “city hall” outside?

I am aware of these problems Chair It seems to be dragging me down-in a broad sense, what does this show think of human education, and what are the reasons why it is obviously worth copying? -Not those it Let me consider. After watching “City Hall”, I was as worried as Dan that the story of “Cancel Culture” would become the main plot of the show. Unless you are quite confident of the moral high ground, you will not name Adorno. In the final review, my condescending portrayal of the students was full of morality.This time, I am very angry Regarding Bill’s completely incoherent defense of his position. “Do you think it is acceptable to make jokes about the Nazis?” — Dean Larson threw a gummy at him — instead of responding, for example, “Yes, of course”, or, “It depends on the joke.” , Bill admitted that it’s always bad to make jokes about the Nazis, and then started a hacker joke of his own.Wouldn’t it be too much to write a decent joke about the Nazis-there are so many to choose from-except that Bill (I think it was deliberate) misquoted “Hitler’s Spring” Producer? One might wonder whether this is just a clumsy attempt to censor scholars sympathetic to the liberation of Palestine. If so, both parties need stronger arguments.

Alison: Hello Kitty’s way of referencing Ju Ju is great. Speaking of Ju Ju, I noticed in the first episode that Title IX officer’s previous job was in a non-profit organization that placed immigrant children in foster families. For me, this is a red flag about Ju Ju’s upcoming adoption narrative. Immigrant children separated from their families should be reunited; Non-profit organizations that promote foster care and adoption are usually Humanity——Sell ​​clothing. Don’t the screenwriter know? In episode 2, I admired the lies that Ji-Yoon had to tell to promote to the agency that he was a suitable adoptive parent. Ji-Yoon wants to know why Ju Ju’s biological mother chose her, but she doesn’t seem to consider that these lies are part of her attraction. For a character so rooted in text analysis and careful reading, this is a strange self-awareness error.

Grace: I’m sure I am not the only one among English professors who yelled “No, you are not!” On the screen, Ji Yoon told Bill, “I’m your boss.” The chair is not a line manager. Thankfully, introducing the company’s language into departmental relations will obscure the real political and economic fault lines. Whose university? our University.

Rebecca: I suspect that I read this show because I am a chair. You are right, the chairman is not the “boss” of tenured faculty members-most of us don’t want to be either. But are you sure we are not regular line managers? Once, I attended a meeting on leadership, and I was upset about having to pay attention to details such as the ink level of the copier. That’s not true leadership, right? Another colleague said, um, yes, keeping it running is a show. This is not the reason for us to enter the academic career, do such work-photocopiers and course arrangements and payroll, and report to the dean. This can be a huge shock into the administration—the cost of not being able to use your brain in your favorite way, and the damage you know it can cause to valuable relationships with colleagues. Ji-Yoon is very important in a small school and a small department. Some people have employees to manage some of these things. Many people don’t. So I think this is the point: strong intellectual participation in ideas is hindered by management.

Alison: Most of the unruliness in this show comes from what is wrong with us Colleagues who show such poor judgment and authority should be managed. Is it the chairman’s responsibility to maintain the integrity (and unchanged) of the entire department, or to transform it to better support its most bureaucratic, smartest, and smartest department? Production member? I was wondering how Yazi said she never went home and was basically on call 24/7 during office hours, and how Ji Yoon threw her under the bus to save Elliott.

Rebecca: Ji Yun comes in with desire, but is pushed into crisis mode and blocked. When you are busy providing basic services, how do you articulate the future? Therefore, Joan leaving her office means more than just an attack on the older female teacher.Do you think any of us think Very picky about admissions?


Source link

Leave a Reply