[ad_1]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Friday rule Managers of the University of Iowa discriminated against religious organizations and further discovered that managers can be personally responsible for their actions.

The case was filed by Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, a student organization that had been active at the University of Iowa for 25 years, and was later cancelled after reviewing whether the student body complied with the university’s human rights laws in 2018. According to the ruling, those who participated in the review of the “Student Organization Cleanup Proposal” were instructed to “look first at religious student organizations.”

“It is difficult for us to find a clearer example of opinion discrimination,” the appeals court found. “The university will focus its’cleanup’ on specific religious groups, and then selectively implement human rights policies on them. Other groups are simply covered up or ignored.”

The court further found that employees cannot be exempted from personal liability under the principle of limited immunity. This legal principle grants government officials immunity from civil litigation unless their actions violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights, a reasonable person will have already known.”

The Court of Appeal ruled: “What the university is doing here is clearly unconstitutional. It discriminates against religious groups in accordance with its human rights policy-while enacting immunity and ignoring other violating groups that may support its mission. The university and the individual “defendants” The First Amendment precedent is blind, or they know they have violated the law and move forward at full speed. Either way, qualified immunity provides no safe haven. “

Before the Court of Appeal A substantially similar ruling was issued in March Involving the challenges posed by another Christian student group written off by the state of Iowa

Iowa stated in a statement, “The university respects the court’s decision and will move forward in accordance with the decision.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply