You are reading a recap of episode 5 of the Netflix series Chair Collaborated with writers Alison Kinney, Grace Lafry, Dan Sinikin and Rebecca Vanzo.Find our other episode recaps here.

For the sake of space and clarity, the following content has been edited.

Rebecca: David Duchovny is like this game In this episode.This reminds me of Keanu Reeves playing a narcissistic version of myself Always be my possibilityThanks to them for keeping his guest appearances secret and the institutions chasing celebrities pleasant.

with: Duchovny is great. It’s great for him to play himself as a self-righteous bastard-I like that his resume is real: Princeton, Yale, “The purely rational schizophrenia critique in Beckett’s early novels.” I hope his paper is available for reading, but obviously it must be read on the Princeton campus. His encounter with Ji Yoon provided her with an opportunity that only we as the audience can see and stand up for discipline. She told him that his thesis was a product of the past and that he had missed three decades of development. Professional literary criticism is not a stage for amateurs. The field of knowledge that we have jointly established through academia needs to be taken seriously-I am not sure Have such oaths been described so seriously in popular culture?

Grace: Ji-Yoon believes that the difference between now and 30 years ago is: “Influence theory, ecocriticism, digital humanities, new materialism, book history, development of gender studies, and critical race theory.” I am not sure about the past few decades. What’s your opinion, I’m particularly not sure why the “gender studies and the development of critical race theory” have a different time from the rest of the list. Ji-Yoon hopes that our audience knows that neither gender studies nor critical race theory are invented In the past 30 years, but by dividing them into different syntactic structures and thus entering different periodicities, I am a little worried about the current white panic, for example, the critical racial study-the informed method of high school courses is still uninterested. Inadvertent viewers of this show might think that today’s universities are being threatened by a group of sober youths rather than the white supremacists who gathered on campuses in Charlottesville, Seattle, Berkeley and other places in 2017. The framework of the show is that the university’s view as a political entity greatly overestimates the risk of the so-called “cancellation of culture” and greatly underestimates the risk of fascist incitement. I don’t know what the answer is, Ga.

guess what?you were able Get the PDF of “A Critique of Purely Rational Schizophrenia in Beckett’s Early Novels”. (Thanks to my spy in Princeton for passing it on to me.) Although I would like to tear it to pieces, I have to say, I think it… is really great for an undergraduate. ? If it is just to explore the fascinating proposition that “Becket has nothing to disbelieve”, I would definitely listen to the author of Beckett’s “Critique of Schizophrenia” for a semester.

with: At the same time, Bill somehow fumbled into the feelings of the Korean community, despite his dramatic faux pas at Minji’s birthday party, where he was drunk and smoked marijuana gum and hydrocodone. . He survived under the care of Juju. He was presented as the nominal “last bus in town” in Ji Yun’s show, but it was really a broken bus.

Alison: agree! I like how Min-ji’s party shows the vitality throughout the show: Ju Ju is a kid, but she has to manage Bill, take care of him, and guide him. (“Bill, it’s not time to eat cake!”) In this show, this is the job of every woman of color, for every white man.

Rebecca: The scene between Yaz and Elliot is a painful reality. How many times have we heard someone say that they would not take the comments seriously without negative comments? Constructive criticism and peer review are vital to our profession. But if someone is a model, we cannot say that it is absurd. Yaz is perfectly qualified to be angry with him. But the dialogue between Yazi and Ji Yoon is more painful and realistic, depicting two friends and colleagues who feel betrayed by each other.

We called four scholars to talk about the drama’s depiction of the academic world, and they did not flinch. Read the summary:

This goes back to the glass cliff problem. I don’t know if anyone tried to intervene in anything Elliot did before Ji-Yoon, even though the department needed to intervene for a long time. Ji-Yoon barely took a five-second job. The dean put pressure on her to enroll and retire. She had the first black woman to be promoted, and she had to deal with the long-term effects of sexism. This is just daily, there is no Bill’s crisis. Elliott probably served as chairman for a long time and was out of contact. This is a common story. There is a group of people in this department who have run it for a long time, and how women and people of color disrupt the status quo-but only so much.

Alison: I was shocked by the performance of these tensions in class. Yaz tells Elliot that he is not a professor because “you have no students.” This was solved very well in the last episode, but I think that until now, those of us who teach are facing a challenge to ask ourselves who teaches well. What are the standards, what are our commitments, and whether we “re-work hard to update and recheck them. I like to follow the debate here on pedagogy and classroom participation. If it makes me wonder: what if I were Elliot What if I am Bill? What if I am Yaz? I can’t be the only one looking at this and asking how I should improve my methods and commitments.

Grace: I admire this kind of program teaching style as a framework for non-level selection. I am worried that I am Eliot! Or, to make matters worse, Duchovny…

This episode attempts to answer the question I have been asking: what should we do?The conversation with David Duchovny is also high-risk because Chair On the one hand, it is necessary to distinguish between selling to Hollywood, “content” and clickbait; on the other hand, it is necessary to revitalize the industry through popular, Twitter-based participatory teaching methods. This move is a bit sneaky, and the purpose is to align David Duchani’s tedious self-education with the old guys represented by Harold Bloom, who Duchani had with them in previous episodes. connect together. I suspect this is a controversial move-I don’t think that those who try to airborne mediocrities to positions of academic influence have much in common with the classicist “dinosaurs”, to use Elliott’s words . However, as a plot, it is quite satisfactory. It makes us believe that the bad guys are all the same, even (as we learned from the differences between Ji-Yoon and Yaz) the good guys have been factionized.


Source link

Leave a Reply