[ad_1]

You can read this article in six minutes. It took me more than an hour to finish writing.

Additional editing and polishing are beneficial to readers.

You can read this article instead of the other 100 articles because people have highlighted, shared, ranked or otherwise filtered other content you might be reading. This kind of curation also creates value.

The mathematics here is really convincing: there are 1,000 potential authors selling books, but only 30 are published. Each book takes a year to write, but it only takes six hours to read. And you didn’t read all 30, only the one with the best reviews… 10,000 hours of work for authors and editors provide you with 6 hours.

Due to the asynchronous nature of the publishing concept and the one-to-many nature, time dilation of polishing and curation is possible.

Asynchronous, because you are not doing it on the spot, but reading it when I write.

One-to-many, because the creator’s work has multiplied in many readers.

A friend recently sent me a note via voice mail. The duration is 14 minutes. Because he didn’t spend ten to fifteen minutes editing it into a three-minute email, he wasted a lot of my time. But the nature of 1:1 interaction means that it’s either his time, or my time, or even Steven.

Listening to someone’s live performance at an open microphone night or concert promises to bring wonderful surprises, but it also means that there will definitely be a lot of free time. Because no one is curating, you have no choice advantage.

One of the surprisingly unnamed benefits of the World Wide Web and organized information sharing is time dilation. The benefits we continue to waste by seeking more humane habits are blindly replacing them in real time.



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply